Satyam Saga

I was discouraged in not writing about the Satyam Saga in the last few days, given my rather critical views and the impact it may create. But I can not hold on further - so here goes my views.

Satyam is a IT leader which has grown to this level through the sheer aggressive drive of its promoters, their commitment and the hard work of the many professionals whose dedicated effort also made this possible. Somewhere along the line, the same characteristics which made this company reach this level of operation, predominantly risk appetite, has gone awry. Instead of owning up the mistakes, and sharing the risk perception with the major share holders, the management had tried to save the situation and resorted to manipulative ways which drove them to cook up accounts.

The first major mistake which the promoters owners did was to continue to treat the company as their personal fiefdom in spite of becoming minority share holders. Employees and the many institutions which invested had implicit faith in the promoters who had brought fame and good returns to them in the past and were not cunning enough to think otherwise.

What the long term investors did not realise was that the promoters appetite for risk had moved on to more riskier avenues in which they had a belief for the future. May be it is still true; but legally and morally they were bound to take the larger stake holders in to confidence, especially the employees.

The fraud which has been done and is currently hurting the employees and other stake holders could not have been done by a select few and that too in a short time. Many of the 42 vertical heads, their vertical's financial controllers or accountants should have been aware of these. Similarly the HR group should be aware of the excess employee list or the fictional list and the money being drained out. Cash with drawal or miscellaneous accounting expenses (euphemism for political cash expenses) must also have been done with the knowledge of all senior officers of the verticals.

Such practises when not collated and viewed as stand alone events, tend to distort the overall picture. (Each one is doing only a minor bit and that too occasionally ; but put together it all adds up to a very large amount). Employees are caught between the devil and deep sea here. If these expenses do not take place, they may tend to believe that their prospects of revenue protection or statutory clearances do not come in as desired. Even when they know that the promoter is taking the money for his personal operations, they typically turn a blind eye as they believe they deserve it.

This perception should change. Executives with delegation of powers in organisation should oppose such moves, even at their risk of being in the bad books of management. They may loose their job or hurt their career growth; but by tolerating they are becoming criminally liable for false fully accounting and misleading the public.

Another major issue is that of inflating the receivables. This is a practice that typically bring down many an organisation. Any responsible officer can not and should not inflate the receivables quarter after quarter, year after year and continue to report inflated profits. Even when they book the orders at competitive prices, they would have known that the profits are not realisable. It is therefore clear that many in the organisations would have known for some time now that the game is over, but because of their own selfish interests and foolish approach, they continued to believe that they will some how overcome the follies for which they have also been responsible.

This is never done and such an approach can only come to this disastrous end as is seen here. There are many lessons to budding executives here in the Satyam saga and I wish they pick it up for their own sake and the interest of the country at large.