TNEB has been postponing the trifurcation of itself to fall in line with the central laws enacted as early as 2003. The models which were tried out immediately after the enactment of the Electricity act, had each its own advantages and drawbacks. It was prudent on the part of TNEB not to jump in to splitting itself immediately after the demand came. It was strategically correct to study the effects of the models, the benefits or otherwise of each of the models.
Having studied the model, postponing the splitting on political grounds is also acceptable for a couple of times. But to repeatedly do so is not conforming to the Centre - State spirit envisaged in the constitution. TNEB is much different from the other electricity boards. The act was not intended for efficient boards like TNEB; but the act was also enacted to corporatise the functioning of the Utility so as to make it independent of the state's budgetary support.
Another major purpose of the act is to bring in more transparency to its own functioning. It would bring in the elements in the system which is generating surpluses together with the sinks, which drain out more than these surpluses. It would have brought in more closer management attention as each of three major functions of the utility, Generation, Transmission and Distribution would get its own top management team who will not act on its own priority instead of having to be dependant on a super team!.
TNEBs maximum demand is nearing 10000 MW and its generation is slated to take a quantum leap in the years to come. As an integrated utility its contribution to the renewable sector is laudable. It has used its Hydro power effectively to remove the "Infirm" attributes of wind power and leverage its integral strength to allow these small generators to bank and wheel, effectively providing the much needed incentives to channelise investment. Here again it needs to do more now. We are now facing funds constraint to provide additional evacuation lines, up gradation/ enhancement of capacity of lines which will take the renewable generation to the next levels.
It is not automating its operations and is now lagging other electricity boards in this segment. It has to substantially enhance its Transmission Line grid and become independent of PGCIL by having its own 400 KV network. Other electricity boards have started planning 765 KV grid and TNEB is still comfortable with its 220 KV grid!
On the distribution front, capacity enhancement by way of implementing UG (under Ground)cabling, GIS (Gas Insulated Substations) substations and Distribution automation are the need of the hour.
TNEB always had a pride of place in the national electricity grid and its operations. Over the years it had to bear the ill effects of excessive political intervention, but has managed to still hang in there.
It may not be able to do so, if it does not quickly change its attitude now. May be a firm push from the Central ministry is the need of the hour to save the board.
